[sc34wg3] Minutes from 7 October 2011

[Inge Henriksen]

Hi, all.

So... TMQL is submitted then? Or did I misunderstand something again? 

Vennlig hilsen / Kind regards ,

Inge.

Inge Eivind Henriksen | Konsulent
Bouvet ASA Sandakerveien 24C D11 Postboks 4430 Nydalen N-0403 Oslo
Tlf. +47 23 40 60 00  |  Faks: +47 23 40 60 01  |  Mob: +47 40 45 44 74
http://www.bouvet.no  | inge.henriksen at bouvet.no 

-----Original Message-----
From: sc34wg3-bounces at isotopicmaps.org [mailto:sc34wg3-bounces at isotopicmaps.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Durusau
Sent: 16. oktober 2011 13:59
To: sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] Minutes from 7 October 2011

Rani,

On 10/16/2011 07:44 AM, Rani Pinchuk wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am sorry for not participating in this discussions.
>
> Patrick, from my point of view, there is no problem to publish the 
> TMQL draft we submitted, if it is accompanied by a clear message 
> mentioning that the editors are well aware that this is a half done 
> work containing many mistakes and inconsistencies, as we were running 
> out of time and resources and had to submit what we had.
>
I think there is some confusion about what it means to "publish" a document in the ISO process.

It is always possible to simply contribute drafts to the SC 34 document repository to show where the editors have gotten at some point in time.

However, such drafts have no "position" as it were in the work flow of documents that progress from NP to WD to CD to DIS, etc.

I can ask Toshiko to enter the document simply as a contribution from the editors to the repository.

The difference is that we are *not* asking all the NBs to review the document for the submission of comments, etc.

Does that help?

Hope you are having a great weekend!

Patrick




> Kind regards,
>
> Rani
>
>
>
> On 15-Oct-2011 13:13, Lars Heuer wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> [Current TMQL draft]
>>> Until we actually (or ISO) cancels the project, I don't know of any 
>>> reason why a draft document could not appear in the repository.
>>
>>> I say that mostly because the SC 34 document repository is more 
>>> likely to be available for future work on query languages than private sites.
>>
>> Yes, I'd prefer that, too.
>>
>> Would be nice if Rani/Benjamin would publish it before any decision 
>> regarding TMQL at ISO is made.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Lars
>


--
Patrick Durusau
patrick at durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
_______________________________________________
sc34wg3 mailing list
sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3