[sc34wg3] TMCL / CTM issue: ctm-integer

Lars Marius Garshol larsga at garshol.priv.no
Mon Jan 4 06:38:20 EST 2010

* Robert Cerny
> I think i might have brought this up in the wrong context. My proposal was not directed at CTM but more at TMCL, which uses CTM as far as i understand mostly for convenience, but is in other aspects independent. So i meant that the defaulting should not take place in the CTM template "has-occurrence", but in the TMCL interpreter.

Actually, the defaulting does happen in the TMCL interpreter. Look at the validation rule here, for example:

where it says:

> (provided max is not undefined)

--Lars M.

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list