[sc34wg3] Some inconsistencies in the tmcl schema
Lars Marius Garshol
larsga at bouvet.no
Wed Oct 28 05:01:04 EDT 2009
* Michael Quaas
> Unfortunately I've found this not yesterday, so it seems that there
> is a
> new version necessary again.
You know, I think I'll just make the changes in CVS this time, and
wait a bit with publishing a new version. :)
Some of these pieces of feedback are showing very clearly that I
haven't yet parsed the schema with a CTM parser. (Which is because we
don't have a draft for the version of CTM I'm using, and so I haven't
updated the Ontopia CTM parser yet.)
> 8. I think there is the same problem on the other side. The
> tmcl:topic-role-constraint plays the unallowed role tmcl:constrains in
> tmcl:constrained-statement (147). Same for tmcl:topic-name-constraint
> (132) and tmcl:topic-occurrence-constraint (140). But all three are
> like this in the templates (53+63+73). Probably they should be
Hmmmm. tmcl:constrained-statement has two roles: constrains and
constrained. So constrains is allowed. These are even listed as
allowed combinations. Did you miss something, or did I misunderstand?
> 9. The new defined tmcl:topic-reifies-constraint should play the role
> tmcl:allows in tmcl:constrained-topic-type (181), but this association
> has no role like this. I think tmcl:constrains is meant.
> 10. Typo at the end of the lines 181 and 182 (swap . and ; ).
> 11. Typo in line 339. Missing "-" (I think)
Also correct. Fixed.
Lars Marius Garshol | Consultant
Bouvet ASA Sandakerveien 24C D11 Postboks 4430 Nydalen NO-0403 Oslo
Phone: +47 23 40 60 00 | Fax: +47 23 40 60 01 | Mobile: +47 98 21 55 50
More information about the sc34wg3