[sc34wg3] TMCL issue: regex?
Lars Marius Garshol
larsga at garshol.priv.no
Sat Nov 7 13:41:20 EST 2009
* Lars Marius Garshol
> I think I got it now. What you're saying is that we have defined
> matching of regular expressions explicitly, but that we haven't said
> anything explicitly about what regular expression syntax to use.
Now I think about it, there really is a problem here. I mean: a bug,
as opposed to sub-optimal text which might confuse some people.
If someone were to write
person isa tmcl:topic-type;
has-subject-identifier(0, 1, "*").
(which is not a syntactically valid regular expression) then there's
nothing anywhere in the draft that says that's wrong. Obviously the
draft should say that.
More information about the sc34wg3