[sc34wg3] CTM: Specifying datatypes

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Tue Mar 31 12:26:07 EDT 2009

> Anyway, I am still not convinced that the datatype-proposal belongs to
> CTM without having defined a more truthful translation between
> datatypes.

According to [1] page no. 28 the committee tends to the opinion that
CTM should not allow this abbreviation. Since I agree with the
committee I won't add this shortcut to the next CTM draft. I think the
benefit is quite low and I'd have too many open questions if we'd
allow this kind of translation.

[1] <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1192.pdf>

Best regards,

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list