[sc34wg3] CTM: Semicolons, dots and other assorted syntax issues

Reidar Bratsberg reidar at ravn.no
Fri Feb 13 17:08:18 EST 2009

On 13. feb.. 2009, at 15:02, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>> The way I read it we have:
>   Reidar Bratsberg: 2, not clear which specific alternative

I'll be happy to decide on a preference:  2 b  :-)

My suggestion is to regard directives in the same way as C  
preprocessor directives (terminated with a newline), but since this is  
against the premises, I'll go for requiring the notation for the  
mergemap directive.


More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list