[sc34wg3] Kyoto agenda
Lars Marius Garshol
larsga at garshol.priv.no
Thu Nov 1 10:35:57 EDT 2007
* Lars Marius Garshol
> I agree. It seems like CTM, TMCL, and TMQL are the most likely
> candidates there. However, if Lars Heuer, Graham Moore, and Robert
> Barta will not be there (as I've been told) I'm worried about
> whether we really can have a complete discussion of all issues in
> Kyoto. All three are really critical to these three standards... :-/
* Patrick Durusau
> OK, assuming that to be the case, are there parts of those
> standards that we can discuss prior to Kyoto with their online
There are, and those discussions have already been in progress for at
least a week or so. We're trying to slowly move them onto the list.
> And when we get to Kyoto, are there issues on those parts that we
> can discuss (usefully, I have found that we can always
> discuss ;-) ) in their absence?
That's the question, I guess. I'm not sure.
> There are other items where the editors will be present so we may
> have to split off what we can discuss about CTM, TMCL and TMQL and
> use the rest of the time for other parts. Such as part 1, the RDF
> TR, etc.
Yep. This was my question, really. What other parts will be covered
More information about the sc34wg3