[sc34wg3] XTM 2.0 - C14N of values with datatype != xsd:anyType

[Lars Heuer]

Hi all,

Why does the XTM 2.0 draft mentions only the C14N of XML? Doesn't it
make sense to point out that other datatypes should be canonicalized
as well? Why has XML such an outstanding position?

It wouldn't make sense to put a list of datatypes into the spec, but a
hint that other values require c14n makes sense, doesn't it?

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
http://www.semagia.com