[sc34wg3] XTM 2.0 - C14N of values with datatype != xsd:anyType

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Tue Jul 25 16:15:33 EDT 2006

Hi all,

Why does the XTM 2.0 draft mentions only the C14N of XML? Doesn't it
make sense to point out that other datatypes should be canonicalized
as well? Why has XML such an outstanding position?

It wouldn't make sense to put a list of datatypes into the spec, but a
hint that other values require c14n makes sense, doesn't it?

Best regards,

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list