[sc34wg3] atomic?

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Jan Algermissen
| 
| I guess 'atomic' is meant as scalar (not complex) and is orthogonal
| to the use of 'fundamental'.

Correct.
 
| Aren't there also complex fundamental types 

Yes, there is one: sets. And that's why "atomic" is used in that
sentence.

| (implicitly defined through the use of the infoset formalism)??

Not in TMDM.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >