[sc34wg3] atomic?

[Jan Algermissen]

On Jul 14, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:

> "The only *atomic* fundamental types...."
>
> Shouldn't that be:
>
> "The only fundamental datatypes..."

I guess 'atomic' is meant as scalar (not complex) and is orthogonal  
to the use of 'fundamental'.

Aren't there also complex fundamental types (implicitly defined  
through the use of the infoset
formalism)??

Jan

________________________________________________________________________ 
_______________
Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer                         
http://jalgermissen.com
Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT'   
http://www.tugboat.de