[sc34wg3] Thoughts on the RM

[Mary Nishikawa]

>*Michel
> > You are saying that you want to discuss whether the Topic Maps Model 
> should
> > *not*  be the new ISO 13250, or whether it should be?
> >
> > If you are saying that it "should be* I will respectfully say again, 
> please
> > look at  the proposal for the new work item for ISO 13250 and the 
> ballot. I
> > think those documents are the basis for the agenda that we have at the 
> moment.

*Sam Hunting

>Mary, sorry, now I'm unclear. What are the numbers for "those documents"
>you are referring to? Thanks.

The two documents are N0358 including the
NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSAL - PROJECT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
and N0388 that also includes comments from the national bodies besides the 
votes.

Please check the JTC1 site, since I think that  N0358 on Jim's site may not 
have the PROJECT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA attached.  As far as I can see, the 
agenda that we have reflects the purpose and justification, program of 
work, project acceptance criteria, votes, and comments from national bodies.

-- Mary




>Sam Hunting
>eTopicality, Inc.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Co-editor:  ISO Reference Model for Topic Maps
>   Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
>Free open source topic map tools:  www.gooseworks.org
>   XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
>Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>sc34wg3 mailing list
>sc34wg3@isotopicmaps.org
>http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3