[sc34wg3] How Two Syntaxes Can Make One Standard
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:12:03 +0200
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Steve Pepper
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:02 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [sc34wg3] How Two Syntaxes Can Make One Standard
> At 19:12 24.07.2001 -0500, Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
> >We had intended to file a Defect Report for 13250, but we are
> >submitting this paper to the committee for discussion, instead.
> To avoid any confusion:
> SC34 already submitted one defect report on 13250 in Berlin (N220)
> and asked the secretariat to ballot it as Technical Corrigendum
> #1 (see http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0213res.htm).
> I'm assuming the defect report you refer to here is the second
> one we discussed, that would be triggered by the addition of the
> XTM DTD as Annex C?
Yes. It is the text about the two syntaxes. It has not been discussed yet.
We propose to discuss this item at the Montreal meeting and see if we end up
with a defect report or not.
Michel Biezunski, InfoLoom
Tel +33 1 44 59 84 29 Cell +33 6 03 99 25 29
Email: email@example.com Web: www.infoloom.com