[sc34wg3] XTM 2.0 topicRef - proposal for an erratum
heuer at semagia.com
Tue Oct 20 17:33:29 EDT 2009
> | There are three changes proposed. Two of them are simple relaxations
> | of constraints, and whereas the last requires adding two new elements.
> But all three are backward compatible, right?
You can parse XTM 2.0 topic maps with an XTM 2.1 parser but you cannot
read XTM 2.1 topic maps with a 2.0 parser.
More information about the sc34wg3