[sc34wg3] XTM 2.0 topicRef - proposal for an erratum

Lars Marius Garshol larsga at garshol.priv.no
Tue Oct 20 13:25:42 EDT 2009

* Steve Pepper
> If I understand correctly, all that is required is a relaxation of a  
> constraint, such that any XTM 2.0 document will still conform to the  
> "new" syntax. In that case it could (and IMO should) be done as a  
> technical corrigendum.

There are three changes proposed. Two of them are simple relaxations  
of constraints, and whereas the last requires adding two new elements.

You can see the list here:

If anyone wants to comment in the tracker or report issues they should  
be able to just use the "register" link.

--Lars M.

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list