[sc34wg3] XTM 2.1, editors' draft

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Thu Nov 26 09:57:35 EST 2009

Hi Lars,

>> "application/x-www-form-urlencoded":
>> <http://projects.topicmapslab.de/issues/1631>

> I admit that if you'd asked me I'd probably have said that we do
> turn "+" into " ", but that's not what the spec says. And now that I
> look into it, neither does RFC 3986 nor XML Base or any other
> similar specs. So it seems that to be conformant with everyone else
> we shouldn't interpret the "+" in any way.

I'd be more than happy to leave it as it is (do not mention "+"). The
reason why I entered the bug report was that we use the "+" encoding
in our CXTM test suite (and in the TMAPI test suite as well).

Best regards,

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list