[sc34wg3] XTM 2.1, editors' draft
heuer at semagia.com
Thu Nov 26 09:57:35 EST 2009
> I admit that if you'd asked me I'd probably have said that we do
> turn "+" into " ", but that's not what the spec says. And now that I
> look into it, neither does RFC 3986 nor XML Base or any other
> similar specs. So it seems that to be conformant with everyone else
> we shouldn't interpret the "+" in any way.
I'd be more than happy to leave it as it is (do not mention "+"). The
reason why I entered the bug report was that we use the "+" encoding
in our CXTM test suite (and in the TMAPI test suite as well).
More information about the sc34wg3