[sc34wg3] XTM 2.1, editors' draft

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Wed Nov 25 07:21:53 EST 2009

Hi all,

>> Although I haven't implemented it yet, it seems to be correct. The
>> idea to have XTM 2.0 and 2.1 in one schema is good. :)

Well, I've forgotten, that I've added an issue regarding URLs which
use "application/x-www-form-urlencoded":

We should think about mentioning it in section 4.3.5 "Creating IRIs
from strings".

Best regards,


More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list