[sc34wg3] More on TMCL MAX_INT

Lars Heuer heuer at semagia.com
Wed Mar 4 10:32:19 EST 2009

>> Yes. That's why I don't like this proposal. Note that "*" and
>> "unbounded" amount to the same thing, unless we invent our own
>> datatype. Whatever we do, none of these values are valid xsd:integers.

> Right, I agree with the other Lars. Either we should use INF
> (xsd:double) or we should use cardinality topics. Contrarily to Lars
> Marius, my preference goes to INF, though.

> If someone wants to invent another datatype, I'd switch to cardinality topics.

@TMCL editors: Did you make a decision regarding the MAX_INT-issue? I
like to include "INF" into the current CTM draft if you still prefer
the xsd:double-solution.

Best regards,

More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list