[sc34wg3] TMQL: XML content vs. < > delimited IRIs
rho at devc.at
Wed Jul 9 10:46:44 EDT 2008
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Lars Heuer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> [<>-IRIs vs. <XML/>]
> > Of course they conflict. Using <> around IRIs is like dropping the
> > N-bomb at every street crossing.
> ... but <> are needed for rootless IRIs like "mailto", "mid", "urn"
> etc., right?
Yes, I understand that now. Thx.
For TMQL I have now:
"http://whatever/" # interpreted as IRI literal
"http://whatever/" ~ # IRI literal used as subject identifier
http://whatever/ # stand-alone IRI used as subject identifier
mailto:rumsti at ramsti # invalid
<mailto:rumsti at ramsti> # stand-alone IRI as subject identifier
Is this along your thinking?
More information about the sc34wg3