[sc34wg3] Subordinate clauses

[Dmitry]

On Wednesday, January 30, 2008, at 06:15AM, "Lars Heuer" <heuer at semagia.com> wrote:
>Hi Dmitry,
>
>[...]
>> I agree, it would be great. Nested topics also can simplify TMCL.
>
>My only concern is, that every change in CTM results in a lot of work:
>- Does it play nicely with TMQL?
>- Is the syntax coherent?
>- Is the language recognisable by parsers?
>- ...
>
>Each change requires this work and work requires time. And if I
>understood SC34 correctly, we do not have time, at least we have to
>push TMQL forward.

I understand this. But when I look at N3 and pre/post Kyoto CTM draft, I think that we did not have enough productive discussions about CTM with listening and understanding of different proposals and concerns.

Dmitry