[sc34wg3] Issue: tmql-boolean-literals

Robert Barta rho at devc.at
Fri Nov 2 04:53:59 EDT 2007

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:05:05PM +0100, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> >I wonder who came to the conclusion that CTM provides boolean
> >literals. CTM never did.
> >
> >I'd consider this issue as resolved, since there is (and never was) a
> >TMQL vs. CTM conflict with boolean literals.
> Robert: is this fine by you? If it is, we just cut out the literals,  
> and that's it.

I would be too happy to get rid of them. I mean, boolean variables are
so 70ish anyway. TMQL only had them when I synced the data types with
an earlier CTM version. No intrinsic reason to keep them.


More information about the sc34wg3 mailing list