Updated answer, Re: [sc34wg3] TMRM v6.0 comments
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:22:37 -0400
An updated answer to your third question:
Nikita Ogievetsky wrote:
> Dear Steve, Patrick, Robert, and all,
> 3) It is not clear what is in (…) between (v1j, v2j,…,v1j) in
> expression (9) on p11
Actually not a typo, just poor editorial practice.
Using capital letters will make it plain:
The text uses a lower case "L" in the last term, which with a fairly
good magnifying glass is different from the number "1" in the subscript
for v at the beginning of the sequence.
Same is true for the second sequence in that equation.
That also happens in expression (12) on page 12, expressions (18), (19),
and (20), on page 13, and expression (21) on page 14.
Note that p_m is used in (13) on page 12, despite P_M being defined as
the set of all path expressions. In (13) it simply marks the last in a
sequence of path expressions.
The usage of p_m is also inconsistent with p_n which you will find in
4.2, condition #3.
There are others I am sure I have not noticed yet so please feel free to
point them out. Consistency and good editorial practice (like not using
graphically similar characters to mean different things) would go a long
way to making the formalism easier to read.
Sorry 'bout that!
Hope you are having a great day!
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!