xml:id RE: [sc34wg3] Compact syntax requirement question
Lars Marius Garshol
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:33:14 +0200
* Jirka Kosek
| I think that 1:1 mapping on syntax level is not really neccessary. I
| think that ability to represent TMDM would be sufficient.
That's what I think, too; just wanted to make sure you agreed.
| Seems I'm little bit behind the latest development of TMDM :-(
I recommend reading the latest drafts of both TMDM and XTM. They
explain all this, and we could really use some critical readings by
new-comers. The drafts are nearly at the end of the ISO process, so we
really do need to ensure that they are as perfect as they can be.
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >