xml:id RE: [sc34wg3] Compact syntax requirement question
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:26:23 +1000
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> * Lars Marius Garshol
> | What's the problem?
> * Robert Barta
> | The 'violation' is the 'problem'. I do not think XTM (or TMDM) should
> | try to fix this. It is, as it is.
> When you wrote "I wonder whether this all works", I took it to mean
> that you had some concern about how TMDM/XTM handled the example you
> posted. Now it seems that you don't. Did I understand you correctly?
Yup. I have no concerns in this regard. Never said/wrote that. Instead...
> Well, a plain XML editor gives you a bit more guidance, but in
> principle the situation is the same.
...this is exactly my point. You need tools in _any_ case. Using XTM
helps to 90% to get a TMDM-sane map. But not 100%, and so, yes, the
situation in principle is the same.