[sc34wg3] Compact syntax requirement question

[Patrick Durusau]

Lars,

Sounds good to me. If the editors would consider the request made, done 
and done.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick


Lars Marius Garshol wrote:

>* M. Altheim
>| 
>| I certainly agree with the notion of "if there's a PSI, use it" but
>| I would not want to be prohibited from using IDs, which become very
>| important, perhaps in a number of cases absolutely necessary, during
>| Topic Map processing.
>
>I agree. The intent of the original requirement was, as Lars wrote, to
>encourage the use of PSIs over IDs. Clearly, IDs must still be
>supported.  In fact, in order to make the really clear we might want
>to add it as another requirement.
>
>  
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Patrick@Durusau.net
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!