[sc34wg3] Compact syntax requirement question
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:18:05 -0400
Sounds good to me. If the editors would consider the request made, done
Hope you are having a great day!
Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>* M. Altheim
>| I certainly agree with the notion of "if there's a PSI, use it" but
>| I would not want to be prohibited from using IDs, which become very
>| important, perhaps in a number of cases absolutely necessary, during
>| Topic Map processing.
>I agree. The intent of the original requirement was, as Lars wrote, to
>encourage the use of PSIs over IDs. Clearly, IDs must still be
>supported. In fact, in order to make the really clear we might want
>to add it as another requirement.
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!