Path language in TMRM: was Re: [sc34wg3] Comments on latest TMRM draft

Lars Marius Garshol
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:17:36 +0200

* Patrick Durusau
| I will reply separately to your other points but since the reason for
| the path language is a major point of your post I wanted to have a
| separate thread on that point.

| While you may not find that entirely persuasive, does it get us any
| closer as to why I think there should be a path language in the

Yes, it makes it a lot clearer. I need to take time out to figure out
what I think of it.

Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: >