[sc34wg3] Documenting merging rules in TMDM
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:47:23 -0500
Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> * Patrick Durusau
> An executive summary of the above would read something like this:
> Patrick, what you are saying makes no sense.
> We can continue to play this game for a long while yet, but that is
> the reality.
Well that really says it all doesn't it?
I posted what I thought was at least a partial reply to Steve's
questions and in addition to your substantive comments (something I
readily concede to be the case), I get brag and abuse.
FYI, despite your apparent opinion, I am not playing a game but engaged
in a serious attempt to make sure the restated ISO 13250 captures all
the power of the original. Regret that you see my efforts in some other
Reconsidering if I should continue with this thread and others or simply
file formal documents and adopt a similar strategy.
Despite our different of opinions on my efforts:
I do hope you are having a great day!
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!