[sc34wg3] RM4TM issue : is role player always a set?
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:10:06 -0000
> Stve, this is a little vehement, I think. RM4TM uses the word "set", and
> presumably has a concept in mind. Does the word need to go in the
> Definitions section? Or is the meaning "obvious," in which case (Martin
> Bryan will correct me here) it would *not* need to go in the Definitions?
Any word that has multiple meanings, only one of which is used in the
standard, should have that meaning spelt out in the definitions section.