parid0393 | Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:42:35
It is propably a good idea to decouple the definitions of TM Applications from the definitions of interchange syntaxes. Suggestion: Add a whole new top level section named "Definitions of interchange syntaxes" addressing the requirements for such definitions. Among these requirements must be the definition of a processing model (propably change the term to 'deserialization specification') that specifies how a given syntax is to be interpreted in terms of a certain model. Syntaxes are not bound to a ceratin model, only processisng models are. A given syntax can be interperted in different ways by different TM models.