[tmcl-wg] Consistency of TMCL Schemas ?

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Bernard Vatant
|
| Bottom line : I tend to try and integrate and make interoperable
| (imperfect) tools available, known and used today, than waiting for
| the perfect tools of tomorrow (or the day after).

I'm having a hard time working out what it is you are trying to say,
or, to put it a different way, why you posted about this. What is it
you are trying to tell us? Don't bother to create TMCL when we already
have OWL? Or something else entirely? Sorry if I'm being dense, but I
really don't get the underlying message here.

(Dmitry has pretty much said what I wanted to say, so I won't repeat
his replies, except for one thing. See below.)

| So far, I've been quite happy with OWL expressivity for constraining
| topic maps.

What do you mean by "topic maps" in this case? RDF?

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >