[sc34wg3] Some inconsistencies in the tmcl schema
michaelquaas at web.de
Wed Oct 28 06:54:45 EDT 2009
Lars Marius Garshol schrieb:
>> 8. I think there is the same problem on the other side. The
>> tmcl:topic-role-constraint plays the unallowed role tmcl:constrains in
>> tmcl:constrained-statement (147). Same for tmcl:topic-name-constraint
>> (132) and tmcl:topic-occurrence-constraint (140). But all three are
>> like this in the templates (53+63+73). Probably they should be
> Hmmmm. tmcl:constrained-statement has two roles: constrains and
> constrained. So constrains is allowed. These are even listed as
> allowed combinations.
Are you sure? When I search for "topic-name-constraint" in the schema
file it's found exactly one time on line 127 where it is defiened. But
it should also occur in a role-combination expression. Same for the others.
More information about the sc34wg3