[sc34wg3] XTM 2.1, editors' draft

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Lars Heuer
> 
> I'm lovin' it (tm)
> 
> Although I haven't implemented it yet, it seems to be correct. The
> idea to have XTM 2.0 and 2.1 in one schema is good. :)

Excellent. :-)

The word from ISO is now that we can do this as a revision of 13250-3, and that this means we don't need to do an NP, but can simply take the current draft directly to ballot as a Committee Draft (CD). That would be a 3-month ballot, after which we can presumably go to FCD. And so on. So there's still time to find bugs in there, if there are any. :)

--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/