[sc34wg3] More on TMCL MAX_INT
heuer at semagia.com
Wed Mar 4 10:32:19 EST 2009
>> Yes. That's why I don't like this proposal. Note that "*" and
>> "unbounded" amount to the same thing, unless we invent our own
>> datatype. Whatever we do, none of these values are valid xsd:integers.
> Right, I agree with the other Lars. Either we should use INF
> (xsd:double) or we should use cardinality topics. Contrarily to Lars
> Marius, my preference goes to INF, though.
> If someone wants to invent another datatype, I'd switch to cardinality topics.
@TMCL editors: Did you make a decision regarding the MAX_INT-issue? I
like to include "INF" into the current CTM draft if you still prefer
More information about the sc34wg3