[sc34wg3] New TMCL draft
motom at green.ocn.ne.jp
Thu Jun 25 05:07:08 EDT 2009
Dear Garshol-san, Moore-san, and All,
The following is my comments:
1. Constraint of the variants
The variants can't constrain by the types because they can't have the types.
But the following constraints of the variants are required in some case:
- Cardinality Constraint
- Scope Constraint
- Reifier Constraint
- Unique Value Constraint
- Regular expression Constraint
I think the way to constrain cardinality of the variants can be added into
the Topic Name Constraint and it should be.
I don't know the way to constrain others. Are there any way to constrain
them? Do we need to add the type of variant into the TMDM?
2. Pharase 7.9 Reifier Constraint
I think the Role Type should be included in the Reifier Constraint.
> Graham and I have produced a new draft of TMCL, which you can find at:
> We believe that this time the shape of the spec, the templates, and
> the PSIs are all fairly stable.
> We *really* want feedback on this version, and especially feedback
> from implementors on whether they can understand and implement the
> spec, and whether they believe different implementors will implement
> it the same way.
> All other kinds of feedback are of course also welcome.
> --Lars M.
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
Motomu Naito <motom at green.ocn.ne.jp>
CEO, Knowledge Synergy Inc. (http://www.knowledge-synergy.com/)
3-747-4-203, Kusunokidai, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-0037 Japan
phone: +81-4-2993-0519 IP phone: +81-50-3341-5502
Delegate to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 (Topic Maps WG) from Japan
More information about the sc34wg3