[sc34wg3] New TMCL draft

[Motomu Naito]

Dear Garshol-san, Moore-san, and All,

The following is my comments:

1. Constraint of the variants

The variants can't constrain by the types because they can't have the types.
But the following constraints of the variants are required in some case:

   - Cardinality Constraint
   - Scope Constraint
   - Reifier Constraint
   - Unique Value Constraint
   - Regular expression Constraint

I think the way to constrain cardinality of the variants can be added into
the Topic Name Constraint and it should be.

I don't know the way to constrain others. Are there any way to constrain
them? Do we need to add the type of variant into the TMDM?


2. Pharase 7.9 Reifier Constraint

I think the Role Type should be included in the Reifier Constraint.


Best regards,

Motomu Naito


> 
> Graham and I have produced a new draft of TMCL, which you can find at:
>    http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmcl/
> 
> We believe that this time the shape of the spec, the templates, and
> the PSIs are all fairly stable.
> 
> We *really* want feedback on this version, and especially feedback
> from implementors on whether they can understand and implement the
> spec, and whether they believe different implementors will implement
> it the same way.
> 
> All other kinds of feedback are of course also welcome.
> 
> --Lars M.
> http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
> http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg3 mailing list
> sc34wg3 at isotopicmaps.org
> http://www.isotopicmaps.org/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg3


----------------------------------------------------------------
Motomu Naito <motom at green.ocn.ne.jp> 
PSI: http://psi.ontopedia.net/Motomu_Naito
CEO, Knowledge Synergy Inc. (http://www.knowledge-synergy.com/)
3-747-4-203, Kusunokidai, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-0037 Japan
phone: +81-4-2993-0519  IP phone: +81-50-3341-5502
Delegate to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 (Topic Maps WG) from Japan